Sign In

Shed light on the case data.

Upload the timekeeping records from discovery. Minutes later: a defensible wage-and-hour exposure analysis, computed statute by statute — run by you, for either side of the matter.

Request access →Methodology
Walker v. Sample Industries — Overviewillustrative data

Total potential exposure

$881,050
across 142 employees · 42,478 shiftsScoped per statute — meal & rest: 4-yr · §226: 1-yr · §203: all data
Meal-period premiums$427,050
48%
4-yr lookback
Meal periods
Rest-period premiums$256,250
29%
4-yr lookback
Rest breaks
Waiting-time penalties$126,000
14%
All data
Waiting time
Wage-statement penalties$71,750
8%
1-yr lookback
Wage statements

From the production to a defensible number.

Upload · confirm · run · read. No expert engagement until trial.

  1. Upload the recordThe data from discovery, as produced. Every row validated first.
  2. Confirm the parametersWaivers, lookback, filing date — every position recorded.
  3. Run the analysisEvery statute at once, each within its limitations period.
  4. View the insightsThe four instruments below, computed on your matter.

One dataset.
Four instruments.

Advise, brief, depose, and mediate on the same numbers. Each instrument has its own page, with the working product on it.

See the product →
Exposure analysis →The total, by claim, each within its own limitations period.
Deponent identification →The employees whose records matter most, ranked by exposure.
Claim insights →Where the violations concentrate, and when.
Data quality →Validation before the run, reconciliation after.

Built for both sides of the matter.
The same data, the same method, the same number — whoever runs it.

Read the methodology — walk a worked example →

See it on your case data.

Closed alpha. Bring one matter; we'll walk the analysis with you.

Request access →